Ross v. Denver County Jail et al
Plaintiff: Darnell Ross
Defendant: Denver County Jail, Judge Ross and Robert Woods
Case Number: 3:2021cv01044
Filed: July 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2021 Filing 8 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order of Dismissal #7 sent to Darnell Ross returned as undeliverable. (joha)
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP #1 is GRANTED, and the Complaint #2 is DISMISSED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he should file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, curing the deficiencies described herein, including alleging a proper basis for venue in this district or refile this action in a district in which venue is proper. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this proceeding, with prejudice. The court defers ruling on Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel #3 until after an amended complaint, if any, is filed. Signed on 8/2/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/2/2021.) (dsg)
July 29, 2021 Filing 6 Notice. Filed by Darnell Ross. (joha)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order by Judge Acosta: Referring Application for Leave to Proceed IFP #1 , Complaint #2 and Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/21/2021.) (pjg)
July 15, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/15/2021.) (joha)
July 14, 2021 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Darnell Ross. (joha)
July 14, 2021 Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Darnell Ross against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (joha)
July 14, 2021 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Darnell Ross. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ross v. Denver County Jail et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darnell Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Denver County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?