Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Parthenon Software Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant: Parthenon Software Group, Inc. and Andrew Schmitt
Case Number: 3:2021cv01076
Filed: July 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Marco A Hernandez
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTES of Proceedings: Rule 16 Telephone Conference. The Court set the following case schedule: Any amended pleadings and responses thereto are due by 10/1/2021. Discovery is to be completed by 12/15/2021. Simultaneously filed Dispositive Motions are due by 1/14/2022. The Court will set oral argument, if needed, following its review of the dispositive motion(s) briefing. Gregory L. Baird present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Paul A. Mockford present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Jill Jessup. Judge Marco A. Hernandez presiding. (jp)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Scheduling Order by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. A Rule 16 Telephone Conference is set for 9/1/2021 at 01:30PM before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Counsel shall use the same call-in information provided for the call previously set for 8/12/2021. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Scheduling Order - On August 4, 2021, the parties were directed to submit a jointly proposed case schedule no later than three business days before the telephone conference set for today, August 12, 2021. A proposed case schedule has not been submitted to the Court. Therefore, the Telephone Rule 16 Conference set for August 12, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. is STRICKEN. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mja)
August 11, 2021 Filing 8 Answer to #4 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, . Filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. (Baird, Gregory)
August 11, 2021 Filing 7 Joint Status Report . Filed by Parthenon Software Group, Inc., Andrew Schmitt. (Mockford, Paul)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Scheduling Order by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. A Rule 16 Telephone Conference is set for 8/12/2021 at 02:30PM before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Counsel are required to confer prior to the conference. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. The Court directs the parties to submit a jointly proposed schedule to the courtroom deputy by email no later than three business days before the hearing (keeping in mind that Judge Hernandez expects civil cases to be tried within 18 months of the date of filing). The parties shall call into the Court's conference line (the phone number provided via separate email) five minutes prior to the scheduled conference time. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
July 22, 2021 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Parthenon Software Group, Inc.. (Mockford, Paul)
July 21, 2021 Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Counterclaim Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. Filed by Parthenon Software Group, Inc., Andrew Schmitt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Mockford, Paul)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/18/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/20/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 12/20/2021. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (kgc)
July 21, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. (Baird, Gregory)
July 21, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8164671 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Baird, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Parthenon Software Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Represented By: Gregory L. Baird
Represented By: Michael E. Farnell
Represented By: Robert W. Kirsher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parthenon Software Group, Inc.
Represented By: Michael E. Farnell
Represented By: Paul A. Mockford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Schmitt
Represented By: Michael E. Farnell
Represented By: Paul A. Mockford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?