Hale v. City of Atlanta et al
| Brian Hale |
| City of Atlanta and State of GA |
| 3:2021cv01318 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
OPINION & ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed IFP #5 . Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, curing deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of this Opinion & Order. The Clerk shall not issue a summons without direction from the Court. Signed on 10/29/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/1/2021.) (jp)
|
| Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sss) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #1 . Filed by Brian Hale. (sss) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/28/2021) (sss). |
| Filing 3 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Brian Hale. (sss) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 09/09/2021.) (kgc) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Brian Hale against City of Atlanta, State of GA. (No Civil Cover Sheet, No IFP, No Fee Paid) (kgc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
