Hagedorn et al v. IT's Leadership et al
| Brian Albert Hagedora, Hagedora Communications, Brian Albert Hagedorn and Hagedorn Communications |
| IT, World and United States Government, IT's Leadership, Microsoft, Google, Apple Computers, Samsung, Motorola, AT&T, Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, Judicial Branch, President of the United States of America and Oregon Governor |
| 3:2021cv01346 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed, without prejudice. The court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). DATED this 27th day of October, 2021 by United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/27/2021.) (pjg) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Plaintiffs Brian Hagedorn ("Hagedorn"), proceeding pro se, and Hagedorn Communications, which Hagedorn also purports to represent, brings this action against numerous government officials. On September 22, 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued an Order to Amend (ECF No. #6 ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) requiring Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies in the complaint and noted in the Court's Order within thirty days. Judge Acosta advised Plaintiffs that if they failed to file an amended complaint within the time provided, this action would be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint within the thirty-day period, or otherwise request an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 27th day of October, 2021, by United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/272021.) (pjg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO AMEND: Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted above. The court notes that the amended complaint will operate as a complete substitute for the present complaint, not as a supplement. Hagedorn is cautioned that if he does not file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days, this action will be dismissed. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED and his Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED with leave to renew at a later stage of the proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of September, 2021, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 9/22/2021.) (pjg)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 09/14/2021.) (kgc) |
| Filing 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Brian Albert Hagedora. (kgc) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #2 . Filed by Brian Albert Hagedora. (kgc) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Brian Albert Hagedora against All Defendants. (IFP pending) (kgc) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Brian Albert Hagedora. (kgc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
