Menard v. Curaleaf, Inc.
| Kathleen Menard |
| Curaleaf, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01433 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Personal Inj. Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court grants Defendants unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time #5 . Defendant's responsive pleading is now due December 21, 2021. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 6 Declaration of Graham M. Sweitzer in Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff' Complaints. Filed by Curaleaf, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #5 .) (Sweitzer, Graham) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, #1 . Filed by Curaleaf, Inc.. (Sweitzer, Graham) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Curaleaf, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 1/28/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/28/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 2/28/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (joha)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8252078 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Kathleen Menard against Curaleaf, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Fuller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Menard v. Curaleaf, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathleen Menard | |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Fuller |
| Represented By: | Kelly D. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Curaleaf, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Graham M. Sweitzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
