Boerger v. PCC Structurals, Inc.
| Brent Boerger |
| PCC Structurals, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01456 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CORRECTED Scheduling Order 8 by Judge Acosta: Telephone Rule 16 Conference is SET for Thursday, 1/13/2022 at 10:00AM in Portland by telephone before Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. The Court's conference call information shall be provided to the parties by separate sealed entry. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 8
Scheduling Order by Judge Acosta: Telephone Rule 16 Conference is SET for Thursday, January 13, 2021 at 10:00AM in Portland before Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. The Court's conference call information shall be provided to the parties by separate sealed entry. (pjg)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Defendants. (O'Connor, Karen) |
| Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by PCC Structurals, Inc.. (O'Connor, Karen) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed as to PCC Structurals, Inc. served on 10/7/2021, answer due on 10/28/2021. (Snyder, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to PCC Structurals, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kgc) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons Filed by Brent Boerger. (Snyder, Daniel) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/2/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/4/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 3/4/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (kgc)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8256828 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Brent Boerger against PCC Structruals, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Snyder, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boerger v. PCC Structurals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brent Boerger | |
| Represented By: | Carl Lee Post |
| Represented By: | John D. Burgess |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Snyder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PCC Structurals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Melissa J. Healy |
| Represented By: | Karen L. O'Connor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
