LeRay v. Tommy et al
| Albert G. LeRay |
| Tommy, Sheriff Mikk Reevz, Officer Edwards and Sergeant Nickelson |
| 3:2021cv01461 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Albert G. LeRay regarding Order on motion/application for leave to proceed IFP #6 , Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Order on motion/application for leave to proceed IFP 5 . (pjg) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Signed on 10/20/2021 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 ; Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg) Modified text on 10/20/2021 (pjg).
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/6/2021.) (dsg) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Albert G. LeRay. (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Albert G. LeRay against Edwards, Nickelson, Mikk Reevz, Tommy (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Albert G. LeRay. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
