Saephan v. Norris et al
| Torn Ching Saephan |
| Norris, Barnes, Officer Norris, Deputy Barnes and Alexis Torlan |
| 3:2021cv01490 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Torn Ching Saephan. (joha) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE: Pursuant to LR 3-4(a), advance payment of all required fees or the filing of an application to proceed in forma pauperis must occur before the Clerks Office can provide any services covered under the Schedule of Fees adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Accordingly, you must either pay the appropriate filing fee in this case or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Filing Fee must be paid by 11/15/2021. (Deposited in outgoing mail with blank IFP application to pro se party on 10/13/2021.) (jk) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/12/2021.) (joha) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. (NO IFP Filed, NO Filing Fee Paid) Filed by Torn Ching Saephan against All Defendants. (joha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
