Laugheed v. Curaleaf, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jennifer Laugheed
Defendant: Curaleaf, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv01497
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice of Pay.gov Refund regarding Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8266434. The request has been granted and the amount of $402.00 will be refunded to Marissa A. Scofield Related Doc #8 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically. (nd)
November 10, 2021 Filing 8 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically regarding Refund Request Due, 4 . Filed by Jennifer Laugheed. (Fuller, Michael)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (ECF No. #5 ). Answer is due by 1/4/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (dsg)
October 27, 2021 Filing 6 Declaration of Graham M. Sweitzer in Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Filed by Curaleaf, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #5 .) (Sweitzer, Graham)
October 27, 2021 Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, #1 . Filed by Curaleaf, Inc.. (Sweitzer, Graham)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 A duplicate payment in the amount of $402.00 was submitted by Jennifer Laugheed in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit #Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court website.. Refund Request is Due 10/25/2021. (lp)
October 13, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Curaleaf, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kgc)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/10/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/14/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 3/14/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (kgc)
October 13, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8266444 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Jennifer Laugheed against Curaleaf, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Fuller, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laugheed v. Curaleaf, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Laugheed
Represented By: Michael R. Fuller
Represented By: Kelly D. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curaleaf, Inc.
Represented By: Graham M. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?