Kremers v. Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC et al
Michael Kremers |
Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC and Essentia Insurance Company |
3:2021cv01717 |
November 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Karin J Immergut |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTES of Proceedings: Telephonic Rule 16 Conference. Joint statement of agreed and disputed facts is due by March 2, 2022. Defendants' motion for summary judgment regarding policy coverage is due by April 29, 2022. Plaintiff's response is due by June 28, 2022. Defendants' reply is due by July 29, 2022. Surreplies are not permitted without leave of Court. All other deadlines, including discovery deadlines, will be set after this Court's ruling on summary judgment. Accordingly, within 14 days of this Court's ruling, parties are to submit a joint case management schedule. Nicholas A. Kahl present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Candice J. Martin present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Jill Jessup. Judge Karin J. Immergut presiding. (jy) |
Filing 10 Proposed Joint Status Report & Case Schedule. Filed by All Defendants. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 9 Scheduling Order by Judge Karin J. Immergut. Telephonic Rule 16 Conference is set for 1/25/2022 at 2:00PM in Portland by telephone before Judge Karin J. Immergut. Before the Conference, at a minimum counsel must conduct real-time conferral by telephone to prepare a proposed case-management schedule to be submitted to the Court prior to the Rule 16 Conference. The parties shall submit a written joint status report (to include proposed case management schedule) no later than 1/19/2022 that include deadlines to complete discovery, to file dispositive motions, and for trial. Parties shall also determine whether they agree to forgo the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), and file separately with the Clerk of Court the form required by LR 26-2 no later than 1/19/2022. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy) |
Filing 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement to Waive Initial Disclosures. Filed by Essentia Insurance Company, Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 7 Answer . Filed by Essentia Insurance Company, Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 6 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Essentia Insurance Company, Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Essentia Insurance Company, Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 3/30/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 4/29/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 4/29/2022. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (kgc) |
Filing 2 Notice of Joinder in Notice of Removal, #1 Filed by Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Buxman, Katie) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 21CV40696 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8324348 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Essentia Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3). (Buxman, Katie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.