Duran v. United States
Joshua Robert Duran |
The United States and United States |
3:2021cv01863 |
December 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Youlee Yim You |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to United States. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha) Modified to correct docket text on 2/4/2022 (joha). |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons to The United States Filed by Joshua Robert Duran. (Levi, Ethan) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 4/26/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 5/26/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (joha) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8353019 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Joshua Robert Duran against The United States (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Levi, Ethan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.