Stevens v. Wilson et al
Michael A. Stevens |
Jack Wilson and State of Oregon Department of Justice |
3:2022cv00066 |
January 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Youlee Yim You |
Other Statutory Actions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Change of Phone Number Notice. Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (kgc) |
Filing 15 Objections to Findings & Recommendation: Complaint #1 should be dismissed #7 . Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (sb) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Plaintiff's second Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #11 is denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/01/2022.) (pvh) |
Filing 13 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed on 2/01/2022 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/01/2022.) (pvh) |
Filing 12 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (dsg) |
Filing 11 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (dsg) |
Filing 10 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #1 . Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (dsg) |
Filing 9 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
Filing 8 ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You: Findings & Recommendation #7 is referred to Judge Marco A. Hernandez for review. Objections, if any, are due Friday, February 25, 2022. If no objections are filed, then the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendations will go under advisement. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/28/22.) (gm) |
Filing 7 Findings & Recommendation: Because plaintiff's complaint is frivolous and fails to state a claim for relief, the case should be dismissed with prejudice under the in forma pauperis statute. Signed on 1/28/22 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/28/22.) (gm) |
Filing 6 ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You: Granting Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #5 . (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/28/22.) (gm) |
Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Michael A. Stevens. (eo) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/12/2022.) (pvh) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You: Pursuant to LR 3-4(a), advance payment of all required fees or the filing of an application to proceed in forma pauperis must occur before the Clerks Office can provide any services covered under the Schedule of Fees adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Accordingly, you must either pay the appropriate filing fee in this case or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 21 days. Filing Fee must be paid by February 2, 2022.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/12/22.) (eo) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/12/2022.) (kgc) |
Filing 1 Complaint (No civil cover sheet, No IFP, No Fee Paid). Filed by Michael A. Stevens against All Defendants. (kgc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.