Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Avery Brown |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv00271 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Amended Return of Service Executed Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certified Mail Return Receipts, #2 Attachment Summons to Parties, #3 Attachment Summons) (Wall, George)
|
|
Filing 9
Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 3/11/2022, answer due on 7/11/2022. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Wall, George)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Appearance of Jeffrey E. Staples appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Staples, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 2/22/22 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (gm)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Karin J. Immergut to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (eo)
|
|
Filing 4
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Avery Brown. (Wall, George)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Avery Brown against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Wall, George)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Avery Brown | |
| Represented By: | George J. Wall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey E. Staples |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
