Adams v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
| Lionel Adams |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC |
| 3:2022cv00483 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Personal Inj. Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Pursuant to MDL 3014, Docket No. 393. Certified on 4/11/2022 by Deputy Clerk Sarah Sewall of the Western District of Pennsylvania. (dsg)
|
| Filing 6 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-23) finalized on 4/11/2022. As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 4/11/2022. (dsg) |
| Case electronically transferred out to the District of Western District of Pennsylvania. Other Court Case Number 2:22-cv-00539 assigned. (dsg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Motion for Stay #4 . All proceedings are stayed until the action is transferred to the MDL. Signed on 4/7/2022 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL No. 3014. Filed by Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tag Along Notice, #2 Exhibit CTO 23, #3 Exhibit Stay Orders) (Scisciani, Anthony) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 7/27/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/26/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 8/26/2022. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (ecp)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (Scisciani, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22cv06230 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8462011 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips RS North America LLC, Philips North America LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Service of Process on Philips North America LLC, #3 Exhibit Notice of Service of Process on Philips RS North America LLC, #4 Exhibit Lionel Adams Voter Registration Record, #5 Exhibit Philips RS North America LLC Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #6 Exhibit Philips RS North America Holding Corporation Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #7 Exhibit Philips North America LLC Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #8 Exhibit Philips Holding USA Inc. Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #9 Exhibit Transfer Order, #10 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet). (Scisciani, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
