Doty, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories et al
Plaintiff: Nancy Doty, Inc.
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv00635
Filed: April 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Case electronically transferred out to the District of Northern District of Illinois. Other Court Case Number 1:22-cv-2510 assigned. (dsg)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Pursuant to MDL 3026. Certified on 5/12/2022 by Deputy Clerk Anya Ellis of the Northern District of Illinois. (dsg)
May 12, 2022 Filing 4 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-3) finalized on 5/12/2022. As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 5/12/2022. (dsg)
May 2, 2022 Filing 3 Waiver of the PROTECTION OF IDENTIFIERS. Filed by Nancy Doty, Inc.. (Bowersox, Jeffrey)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 8/29/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 9/26/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 9/26/2022. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (sb)
April 29, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8501125 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Nancy Doty, Inc. against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Bowersox, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doty, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Doty, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Bowersox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?