Justiniano-Torres v. Hendricks
Petitioner: Edgardo Justiniano-Torres
Respondent: Warden Hendricks
Case Number: 3:2022cv00852
Filed: June 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey Armistead
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Granting respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #9 . Answer is due by 9/23/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/28/2022.) (ps1)
July 27, 2022 Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 . Filed by Hendricks. (Conti, Patrick)
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 on respondent. Signed on 7/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/20/2022.) (Sent order, petition, and acceptance to USAO via interoffice mail.) (dsg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2022: #1 Acceptance, #2 Petition) (dsg).
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: IT IS ORDERED that petitioner must file an amended application curing the deficiency within thirty days of the date of this order. Petitioner is advised that the failure to file an amended application may result in the dismissal of this proceeding for lack of prosecution Signed on 7/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/20/2022.) (dsg)
July 15, 2022 Filing 6 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres. (dsg)
July 15, 2022 Filing 5 Notice regarding fee. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres. (dsg)
June 27, 2022 Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that petitioner must submit the $5.00 filing fee or anapplication to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. The failure todo so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 6/15/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/16/2022.) (dsg)
June 13, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/13/2022.) (dsg)
June 13, 2022 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal). NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres against Hendricks (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition). (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Justiniano-Torres v. Hendricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edgardo Justiniano-Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Hendricks
Represented By: Patrick J. Conti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?