Justiniano-Torres v. Hendricks
Edgardo Justiniano-Torres |
Warden Hendricks |
3:2022cv00852 |
June 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jeffrey Armistead |
Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: Granting respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #9 . Answer is due by 9/23/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/28/2022.) (ps1) |
Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 . Filed by Hendricks. (Conti, Patrick) |
Filing 8 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 on respondent. Signed on 7/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/20/2022.) (Sent order, petition, and acceptance to USAO via interoffice mail.) (dsg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2022: #1 Acceptance, #2 Petition) (dsg). |
Filing 7 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: IT IS ORDERED that petitioner must file an amended application curing the deficiency within thirty days of the date of this order. Petitioner is advised that the failure to file an amended application may result in the dismissal of this proceeding for lack of prosecution Signed on 7/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/20/2022.) (dsg) |
Filing 6 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres. (dsg) |
Filing 5 Notice regarding fee. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres. (dsg) |
Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that petitioner must submit the $5.00 filing fee or anapplication to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. The failure todo so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 6/15/2022 by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/16/2022.) (dsg) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/13/2022.) (dsg) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal). NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Edgardo Justiniano-Torres against Hendricks (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition). (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Justiniano-Torres v. Hendricks | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Edgardo Justiniano-Torres | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Hendricks | |
Represented By: | Patrick J. Conti |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.