Smith v. City of Portland et al
| Damesha Smith |
| City of Portland and John Does 1-5 |
| 3:2022cv00927 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to City of Portland. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (kgc) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Chavez, Juan) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/27/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/28/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 11/28/2022. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (kgc)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8568822 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Damesha Smith against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Chavez, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
