Clark v. Neighborhood Health Center, et al
| Ian Leonard Clark |
| Neighborhood Health Center, Coleman Bright, Lindsey Scott and Darla Lundmark |
| 3:2022cv00932 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: Mr. Clark provides no legal basis to recuse Judge Beckerman in this lawsuit. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to recuse Judge Beckerman. ECF #13 . IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/10/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/10/2022.) (gw)
|
| Filing 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse. Filed by Ian Leonard Clark. (ecp) Modified on 8/8/2022 to correct title and event type (gw). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's motion to rescind his electronic filing privileges (ECF No. #10 ). Plaintiff's request to return to conventional filing is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to Plaintiff on 8/4/2022.) (gw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #7 ). Answer or other responsive pleading is due by 10/3/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
|
| Filing 11 Objection to Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time #7 . Filed by Ian Leonard Clark. (ecp) |
| Filing 10 Motion to Voluntarily Rescind Electronic Filing Privileges. Filed by Ian Leonard Clark. (ecp) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER regarding Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #7 ). Plaintiff's Response is due by 5:00 PM on Friday, 7/29/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Sent by electronic mail to Plaintiff on 7/28/2022.) (gw)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time . Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hood ISO Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time) (Hood, Drake) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed as to Coleman Bright served on 7/14/2022, answer due on 8/4/2022; Darla Lundmark served on 7/14/2022, answer due on 8/4/2022; Neighborhood Health Center served on 7/14/2022, answer due on 8/4/2022; Lindsey Scott served on 7/14/2022, answer due on 8/4/2022. (dino) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Granting Application of Ian Leonard Clark for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party (ECF No. #4 ). Signed on 7/5/2022 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to Plaintiff on 7/5/2022.) (gw)
|
| Filing 4 Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Ian Leonard Clark. (ecp) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 10/28/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/28/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 11/28/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/30/2022.) (ecp)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (ecp) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Receipt No. 98586. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Ian Leonard Clark against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (ecp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
