Brauer v. McMenamins, Inc.
Matthew Scott Brauer |
McMenamins, Inc. |
3:2022cv01078 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Youlee Yim You |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 is GRANTED. Answer or other responsive pleading is due September 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh) |
Filing 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by McMenamins, Inc.. (Williams, Elliott) |
Filing 7 Return of Service Executed as to Matthew Scott Brauer served on 8/11/2022, answer due on 9/1/2022. (Dukelow, Owen) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to McMenamins, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (dino) |
Filing 5 Copyright Report: This report is being submitted pursuant to 17 U.S.C. section 508(a), which states: Within one month after the filing of any action under this title, the clerks of the courts of the United States shall send written notification to the Register of Copyrights setting forth, as far as is shown by the papers filed in the court, the names and addresses of the parties and the title, author, and registration number of each work involved in the action. (Mailed to the Register of Copyrights). (dino) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/22/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/22/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (dino) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons Filed by Matthew Scott Brauer. (Dukelow, Owen) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint, #1 . Filed by Matthew Scott Brauer. (Dukelow, Owen) |
Filing 1 Complaint. for Copyright Infringement Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8595106 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Included copyrights: VA 2-083-389--NIY171208--Matthew Scott Brauer. Filed by Matthew Scott Brauer against McMenamins, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 Example of Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 Demand Letter). (Dukelow, Owen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brauer v. McMenamins, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Scott Brauer | |
Represented By: | Owen Warner Dukelow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: McMenamins, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Elliott J. Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.