Suk v. JM Bullion, Inc.
| Samuel Suk |
| JM Bullion, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01085 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (sb)
|
|
Filing 12
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement . Filed by JM Bullion, Inc.. (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. #5 ). Oral Argument is set for Tuesday, 10/11/2022, at 02:30 PM in Portland by telephone before Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. Conference call information to follow by separate sealed entry. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
|
|
Filing 9
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Agreement . Filed by Samuel Suk. (Acker, Randal)
|
|
Filing 8
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 7
Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 Oral Argument requested. Filed by JM Bullion, Inc.. (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
Response to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Samuel Suk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Ferreira, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument requested. Filed by JM Bullion, Inc.. (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
Civil Cover Sheet regarding Notice of Removal, #1 . Filed by JM Bullion, Inc.. (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 11/23/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/23/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 12/23/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (sb)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by JM Bullion, Inc.. (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV20600 from Multnomah Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8597182 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by JM Bullion, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert E. Byerley, Jr., in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Daniel B. Heidtke in Support of Notice of Removal). (Heidtke, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suk v. JM Bullion, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Suk | |
| Represented By: | Randal B. Acker |
| Represented By: | Aaron S. Ferreira |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JM Bullion, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel B. Heidtke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
