DeSantiago v. United States et al
| Savino DeSantiago |
| United States, Seth Melvin, Jordan Guthrie, Michelle Miller, Brandon Sarti, City of Winston, Winston Police Department, Erik Johnson, John Hanlin, Douglas County and Douglas County Sheriffs Dept |
| 3:2022cv01120 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint, #1 . Filed by Savino DeSantiago. (sb) |
| Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Savino DeSantiago. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement) (sb) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint #1 . Filed by Savino DeSantiago. (sb) |
| Filing 3 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sb) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/2/2022.) (ecp) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Savino DeSantiago against City of Winston, Douglas County, Douglas County Sheriffs Dept, Jordan Guthrie, John Hanlin, Erik Johnson, Seth Melvin, Michelle Miller, Brandon Sarti, United States, Winston Police Department (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (ecp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
