Sitbon v. City of Portland et al
| Phillip Sitbon |
| City of Portland, Craig Lehman and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2022cv01148 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Craig Lehman, City of Portland. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (dino) |
| Filing 6 Amended Proposed Summons Filed by Phillip Sitbon. (Gersten, Jonathan) |
Filing 5
ORDER - The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, ECF #2 . Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Filed by Phillip Sitbon. (Gersten, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (dino) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Phillip Sitbon. (Gersten, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. (In forma pauperis status selected) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Phillip Sitbon against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Gersten, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
