Timmons v. City of Portland et al
Plaintiff: Ted Timmons
Defendant: City of Portland and Bryce Askelson
Case Number: 3:2022cv01235
Filed: August 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Granting City of Portland's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #7 ). Answer or other responsive pleading is due by 11/17/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
October 14, 2022 Filing 8 Declaration of Caroline Turco . Filed by City of Portland. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #7 .) (Turco, Caroline)
October 14, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint #1 . Filed by City of Portland. (Turco, Caroline)
October 14, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance of Caroline Turco appearing on behalf of City of Portland. Filed by on behalf of City of Portland. (Turco, Caroline)
September 14, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bryce Askelson, City of Portland. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sb)
September 14, 2022 Filing 4 Amended Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Filed by Ted Timmons. (Chavez, Juan)
September 12, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Chavez, Juan)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/27/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/26/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 1/26/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (sb)
August 22, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8628583 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Ted Timmons against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Chavez, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timmons v. City of Portland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ted Timmons
Represented By: Franz H. Bruggemeier
Represented By: Jonathan Gersten
Represented By: Juan C. Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Portland
Represented By: Caroline Turco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryce Askelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?