Van Wilde v. City of Portland, et al
Plaintiff: HEATHER-LYNNE VAN WILDE
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND, PPB P.O. JOHN DOE and John Doe
Case Number: 3:2022cv01244
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey Armistead
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #4 . Deadline for defendant City of Portland to file an appearance is extended to 11/14/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (pjg)
October 12, 2022 Filing 5 Declaration of Linh T. Vu ISO Unopposed MOET. Filed by City of Portland, John Doe. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #4 .) (Vu, Linh)
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by John Doe, City of Portland. (Vu, Linh)
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to City of Portland. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/22/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/23/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 1/23/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (ecp)
August 23, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8630558 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by HEATHER-LYNNE VAN WILDE against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet with Ic attachment, #2 Proposed Summons City). (Moisan, Jane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Van Wilde v. City of Portland, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HEATHER-LYNNE VAN WILDE
Represented By: Franz H. Bruggemeier
Represented By: Juan C. Chavez
Represented By: Jane L. Moisan
Represented By: Jonathan Gersten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND
Represented By: Linh T. Vu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PPB P.O. JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Linh T. Vu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?