Rasher v. Hendrix
| Kevin Frank Rasher |
| Hendrix |
| 3:2022cv01295 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Declaration of Angela Kelly . Filed by Hendrix. (Related document(s): Response to Habeas Petition (2241) #9 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-16) (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
| Filing 9 Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 . Filed by Hendrix. Petitioners brief is due by 12/19/2022. Habeas Petition is taken under advisement as of 1/3/2023. (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Granting respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 . Answer is due by 10/18/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/11/2022.) (ps1)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 . Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Hendrix. (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
| Filing 6 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the US Attorney on behalf of Respondent Filed by Hendrix. (Rice-Stitt, Austin) |
| Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sb) |
|
Filing 4
Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 #1 on respondent. Signed on 9/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment, #2 Petition)(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 9/20/2022.) (Sent order, acceptance and petition to USAO via interoffice mail.) (dsg)
|
| Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 99598 issued. (ljp) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner must submit the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Petitioner's failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 8/30/2022 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/30/2022.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/30/2022.) (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal) (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid). Filed by Kevin Frank Rasher against Hendrix. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rasher v. Hendrix | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kevin Frank Rasher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Hendrix | |
| Represented By: | Austin Rice-Stitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
