Kakodkar et al v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Swati Kakodkar and Sujitkumar Kakodkar |
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
3:2022cv01947 |
December 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Stacie F Beckerman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. |
Filing 5 Joint Status Report and [Proposed] Joint Case Management Schedule. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Thede, Nicholas) |
Filing 4 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Thenell, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Thenell, Daniel) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV38800 from State of Oregon, Washington County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8759471 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit). (Thenell, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.