Thrive Hood River et al v. Loftsgaarden et al
Thrive Hood River, Oregon Wild, Sierra Club, Oregon Nordic Club, Friends of Mount Hood, Oregon Kayak and Canoe Club and Mike McCarthy |
Meta Loftsgaarden and United States Forest Service |
3:2022cv01981 |
December 24, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jeffrey Armistead |
Environmental Matters |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (Attachments: #1 Issued Summons) (ecp) |
![]() |
Filing 1 Complaint. FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, VACATUR OF ILLEGAL AGENCY DECISION Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8765919 Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Sierra Club, Oregon Wild, Thrive Hood River, Friends of Mount Hood, Mike McCarthy, Oregon Kayak and Canoe Club, Oregon Nordic Club against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint (Statutory Text), #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Proposed Summons Summons - Forest Service, #5 Proposed Summons Summons - Meta Loftsgaarden). (Buss, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.