Greenthread, LLC v. Intel Corporation
| Greenthread, LLC |
| Intel Corporation |
| 3:2022cv02001 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 43 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Attorney J. Stephen Ravel regarding Order #42 . (gm) |
Filing 42
ORDER: Granting Defendant Intel Corporation's Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney J. Stephen Ravel as Counsel of Record #41 . Signed on 2/16/23 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (gm)
|
| Filing 41 Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney J. Stephen Ravel as Counsel of Record. Filed by Intel Corporation. (gm) |
| Filing 40 Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. (gm) |
|
Filing 38
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Defendant Intel Corporation's partially opposed Motion for a Status Conference #37 is Denied with leave to renew. As previously stated in the 2/1/2023 Order 34 , the Court will determine case deadlines (including the need for a status conference), the need for a Markman hearing, and the timing/phasing of discovery after it has the opportunity to review the parties' past filings and any relevant Western District of Texas rulings. The Clerk in the District of Oregon is directed to file the Amended Complaint (attached as Ex. 1 to the parties' Joint Brief #36 ) as of 12/21/2022, the date the case between Plaintiff and Defendant Intel Corporation (only) was severed and opened in the District of Oregon. (gm)
|
| Filing 37 Motion for Status Conference. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Mina, Gregory) |
| Filing 36 Joint Brief in Response to February 1, 2023 Order. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit) (Mina, Gregory) |
| Filing 35 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Attorney J. Stephen Ravel regarding Order 34 . (gm) |
|
Filing 34
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: The Court has thoroughly reviewed the parties' 1/30/2023 Joint Status Report. The parties shall file the dispositive complaint and responsive pleading/motion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas ("WDTX") within seven days. Additionally, any other motions/briefing emanating from the WDTX and in need of a ruling shall be lodged in this case within seven days. The Court will make a determination concerning case deadlines, the need for a Markman hearing, and the timing/phasing of discovery after it has had the chance to review the parties' past filings and any relevant WDTX rulings. Regarding electronically stored information, plaintiff is entitled to e-mail discovery from the eight specific witnesses defendant previously identified. The limitations imposed on discovery relating to interrogatories, RFPs, and RFAs under the Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedures shall govern this case. Finally, if the parties would like a protective order to issue in this District, they must confer and file an appropriate motion in accordance with FRCP 26(c) and LR 26-4. (gm)
|
| Filing 33 Joint Status Report by Greenthread, LLC. Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Kampars, Nicholas) |
| Filing 32 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, 20 sent to Nicholas Matich returned as undeliverable. (ecp) |
| Filing 31 Clerk's Notice of Pay.gov Refund regarding Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790464. The request has been granted and the amount of $300.00 will be refunded to Edward Miller Related Doc #29 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically,. (nd) |
| Filing 30 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Scheduling Order,, 5 sent to Nicolas Theodore Matich, IV returned as undeliverable. (ecp) |
| Filing 29 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically regarding Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John B. Campbell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790477 #23 . Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Campbell, John) |
| Filing 28 A duplicate payment in the amount of $300.00 was submitted by Greenthread, LLC in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit #Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court's website. Refund Request is Due 1/30/2023. (nd) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Plaintiff Greenthread, LLC's Applications/Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #23 , #24 , #25 & #26 as to Attorneys John B. Campbell, Nicholas Theodore Matich, IV, Alan Lee Whitehurst & Arvind Jairam. (gm)
|
| Filing 26 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Arvind Jairam. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790532. Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Jairam, Arvind) |
| Filing 25 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Alan Lee Whitehurst. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790523. Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Whitehurst, Alan) |
| Filing 24 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nicholas Theodore Matich, IV. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8790506. Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Matich, Nicholas) |
| Filing 23 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John B. Campbell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790477. Filed by Greenthread, LLC. (Campbell, John) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nicholas Theodore Matich, IV. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8790506 #24 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Arvind Jairam. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790532 #26 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John B. Campbell. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790477 #23 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Alan Lee Whitehurst. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790523 #25 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Filing 22 Notice of Appearance of Nicholas A. Kampars appearing on behalf of Greenthread, LLC . Filed by on behalf of Greenthread, LLC. (Kampars, Nicholas) |
| Filing 21 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to non-admitted counsel of record regarding Order 20 . (gm) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Defendant Intel Corporation's Applications/Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 , #11 , #12 , #13 , #14 , #15 , #16 , #17 , #18 & #19 as to Attorneys Gregory S. Arovas, Robert Appleby, Jon Carter, Christopher DeCoro, Todd Friedman, Abigail Lauer Litow, Bao Nguyen, John Rhine, Leslie M. Schmidt, and Nyika O. Strickland. (gm)
|
| Filing 19 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Christopher Decoro. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8782794. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Decoro, Christopher) |
| Filing 18 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Jon Carter. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782768. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Carter, Jon) |
| Filing 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Abigail Lauer Litow. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782755. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Litow, Abigail) |
| Filing 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Bao Nguyen. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782743. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Nguyen, Bao) |
| Filing 15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John Rhine. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782723. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Rhine, John) |
| Filing 14 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nyika O. Strickland. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782709. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Strickland, Nyika) |
| Filing 13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Leslie M. Schmidt. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782687. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Schmidt, Leslie) |
| Filing 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Todd Friedman. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782675. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Robert Appleby. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782664. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Appleby, Robert) |
| Filing 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Gregory S. Arovas. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782620. Filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-List of Court Admissions) (Arovas, Gregory) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Jon Carter. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782768 #18 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Leslie M. Schmidt. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782687 #13 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Todd Friedman. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782675 #12 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Christopher Decoro. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: CORDC-8782794 #19 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Gregory S. Arovas. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782620 #10 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Nyika O. Strickland. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782709 #14 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Robert Appleby. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782664 #11 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney John Rhine. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782723 #15 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Abigail Lauer Litow. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782755 #17 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Bao Nguyen. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8782743 #16 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (ecp) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance of Gregory J. Mina appearing on behalf of Intel Corporation. Filed by on behalf of Intel Corporation. (Mina, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance of Renee E. Rothauge appearing on behalf of Intel Corporation. Filed by on behalf of Intel Corporation. (Rothauge, Renee) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to corrected non-admitted counsel of record Todd M. Friedman regarding documents 3 , #4 & 5 . (gm) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to non-admitted counsel of record regarding Order 5 . (gm) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: As stated in the Court's Notice to Non-Admitted Counsel 3 , Counsel for the parties are required by Local Rule 83 to be generally or specially admitted for practice in the district court for the District of Oregon. Counsel are therefore Ordered to comply with this directive by 1/30/2023. In addition, the parties shall confer and submit a formal Joint Status Report by 1/30/2023 specifically addressing the need for any Amended Complaint to be filed in this newly severed case. Due to the nature of this case which was Ordered severed and filed in this district by the Western District of Texas, the filing fee for this district's case is Waived. (gm)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (eo) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO NON-ADMITTED COUNSEL: This case has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon from the Western District of Texas (Waco). Our records indicate that you are not generally admitted to practice or are only admitted pro hac vice in a previous case in the District of Oregon. Admissions information is governed by #LR 83, and information about the admissions process is available on the #admissions page of the Court website. Related Document Case Transferred In - District Transfer #2 . (eo) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 6:22-cv-01293. Electronic file received. |
|
Filing 1
ORDER from 6:22-cv-00105 severing that case and opening/transferring this case. Case will be transferred to Oregon. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (Attachments: #1 AO120 Reports from originating case)(lad) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/29/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
