Orwick v. Walmart, Inc.
Laurie Orwick |
Walmart, Inc. an Arkansas corporation, doing business in the State of Oregon doing business as Wallmart Store No: 1843 |
3:2023cv00091 |
January 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jeffrey Armistead |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER issued by Judge Armistead: Setting a Telephone Rule 16 Conference for Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 10:30AM in Portland before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. The court's conference call information shall be provided to the parties by separate sealed entry. Local Rules 16-2(b) and 26-1 require that counsel confer prior to the conference. Rule 16 Conferences are ordinarily held telephonically. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. If the parties plan to present a proposed schedule, they should e-mail the schedule to pam_geringer@ord.uscourts.gov, by noon on April 20, 2023. Alternatively, the parties may file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan by noon on April 20, 2023. If the proposed schedule is acceptable to the court and no significant issues need to be discussed, the court may decide that the Rule 16 Conference is unnecessary and strike it. The parties may file written consents to magistrate judge jurisdiction at any time, but the court recommends that consent forms be filed before a dispositive motion (i.e., motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment) is heard. (The consent form is attached.) For more information regarding the role of magistrate judges and consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction, see ord.uscourts.gov/consent. If the parties have a discovery dispute, they should jointly email Courtroom Deputy Pam Geringer at the e-mail address above, and the court will promptly schedule a telephonic hearing to discuss the matter. (pjg) |
Filing 8 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) with Jury Demand . Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 7 Notice of Diversity Disclosure Statement Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Compliance with Requirement to Give Notice of Removal. Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 5 Notice to Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 5/19/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/20/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 6/20/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead. (ecp) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 2 Declaration of Jessica Lancaster ISO Defendant's Notice of Removal. Filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit C - SOP) (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV41768 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8790984 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Walmart, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet). (Lancaster, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.