Mastrandrea v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
| Mark W. Mastrandrea |
| Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and UNUM Group Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00111 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Stipulated Motion to Strike and Reset Pretrial Deadlines. Filed by Mark W. Mastrandrea. (Roy, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by All Defendants. Filed by Mark W. Mastrandrea. (Roy, Christopher) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 5/23/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/22/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 6/22/2023. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (ecp)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8794643 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Mark W Mastrandrea against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Roy, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
