Armstrong v. Carruthers
| Silas Armstrong |
| Nancy Carruthers |
| 3:2023cv00140 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Motor Vehicle Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Resetting the Telephonic Rule 16 Conference from 4/17/2023 at 2:00PM to 4/18/2023 at 2:00PM in Portland Chambers before Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. Local Rules 16-2(b) and 26-1 require that counsel confer prior to the conference. Ahead of the conference, the parties shall submit a formal joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting, particularly if a firm trial date is desired. (gm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Setting a Telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 4/17/2023 at 2:00PM in Portland Chambers before Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. Local Rules 16-2(b) and 26-1 require that counsel confer prior to the conference. Ahead of the conference, the parties shall submit a formal joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting, particularly if a firm trial date is desired. (gm)
|
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint with Jury Demand. . Filed by Nancy Carruthers. (Street, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Notice of Removal, #1 . Filed by Nancy Carruthers. (Street, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 5/30/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/29/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 6/29/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (ecp)
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 22CV42015 from Multnomah County Circuit. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8801311 issued.. Filed by Nancy Carruthers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, Summons & Proof of Service). (Street, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armstrong v. Carruthers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Silas Armstrong | |
| Represented By: | William C. Stavley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy Carruthers | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. Street |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
