Manning v. Martinez et al
| Andrew James Manning |
| Captain Jose Martinez and Multnomah County Sheriff Office |
| 3:2023cv00231 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER. THE COURT ORDERS that Petitioner shall submit the $5.00 filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within thirty days of the date of this order. The Court advises Petitioner that his failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 4/14/2023 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to Petitioner on 4/14/2023.) (gw)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/16/2023.) (bd) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241- Federal) (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid). Filed by Andrew James Manning against Jose Martinez, Multnomah County Sheriff Office. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Petition for Writ of Habeas corpus (Illegal Pretrial Detention), #2 Exhibits.) (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
