Barnett v. Polk County et al
Andrew Barnett |
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick, Jeff Isham, Sgt. Vorhees, Sgt. Lowe, Sgt. Redding, Sgt. Heikila, Sgt. Smalley, Cpl. Brooks, Deputy Fleming, Deputy Hutchensen, Deputy James, Deputy Sikes, Deputy Reese, Deputy Arndt, Deputy Eastlund, Deputy Frey and Jody Germond |
3:2023cv00537 |
April 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Ann L Aiken |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (jw) |
Filing 7 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (jw) |
Filing 6 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (dsg) |
Filing 5 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (kgc) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/12/2023.) (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Andrew Barnett against Arndt, Richard Bittick, Brooks, Eastlund, Fleming, Frey, Mark Garton, Jody Germond, Heikila, Hutchensen, Jeff Isham, James, Lowe, Polk County, Redding, Reese, Sikes, Smalley, Vorhees. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Andrew Barnett. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.