Dinwiddie v. Sephora USA, Inc. et al
| Jordan Dinwiddie |
| Sephora USA, Inc. and Cisco Doe |
| 3:2023cv00562 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Change of Address. and Unavailability Filed by All Defendants. (Wess, Tessan) |
| Filing 4 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) and Affirmative Defenses. Filed by Sephora USA, Inc.. (Wess, Tessan) |
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 8/15/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 9/14/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 9/14/2023. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (ecp)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Sephora USA, Inc.. (Wess, Tessan) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV09972 from Multnomah County. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: BORDC-8895948 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Sephora USA, Inc., Cisco Doe (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - state court docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (Wess, Tessan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
