Barnett v. Multnomah County Jail et al
Andrew Laud Barnett |
Multnomah County Jail, Sheriff Morrisy, Lieutenant Monohan, Sgt. Taylor, Sgt. Bloomster, Deputy Stidum, Deputy Ruiz, Deputy Thomas and Deputy John Doe |
3:2023cv00733 |
May 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Ann L Aiken |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP (ECF No. #1 ) is DENIED. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the $402.00 filing and administrative fee. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action. Signed on 06/20/2023 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 06/20/2023.) (bd) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Assignment Notice #3 sent to Andrew Laud Barnett on 05/19/2023 returned as undeliverable. (bd) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 05/19/2023.) (bd) |
Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Andrew Laud Barnett against All Defendants. (bd) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Andrew Laud Barnett. (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.