Sapp v. ProBuild Contractors, LLC et al
Timothy Scott Sapp |
ProBuild Contractors, LLC, ServPro of Northwest Portland, PDX Restoration, LLC, Lorelei E. Steen, Nicholas J. Steen, Jason Gomez and John Allen |
3:2023cv00743 |
May 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael H Simon |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/18/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/16/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 10/16/2023. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (ecp) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Complaint, #1 . Filed by Timothy Scott Sapp. (Mittendorf, Andrew) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8942652 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Timothy Scott Sapp against John Allen, Jason Gomez, PDX Restoration, LLC, ProBuild Contractors, LLC, ServPro of Northwest Portland, Lorelei E. Steen, Nicholas J. Steen. (Mittendorf, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.