Whitmore v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.
| Mary Whitmore |
| Amazon.com Services, Inc. doing business as Amazon Fulfillment Center |
| 3:2023cv00844 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Adrienne Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, ECF #19 , is GRANTED for good cause. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF #5 , is October 6, 2023. Plaintiff is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Plaintiff is further advised that failure to respond to the motion by October 6, 2023 may result in dismissal of this action. Ordered on 8/7/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
|
| Filing 20 Response Defendant's Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's to Motion for Extension of Time #19 . Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Response to Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 18 ). Filed by Mary Whitmore. (dino) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This Court is in receipt of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF #5 . Plaintiff has failed to respond to Defendant's motion by the deadline set in this Court's previous order, ECF 15 . Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by 7/28/2023 why failure to respond to Defendant's motion should not result in dismissal of this action. Ordered on 7/25/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut.(E-mailed to pro se party on 7/25/2023.) (jp) Modified on 7/25/2023 (jp).
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR CM/ECF REGISTRATION AS A SELF-REPRESENTED PARTY: Plaintiff's Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party, ECF #16 , is GRANTED. Ordered on 7/21/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
|
| Filing 16 Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Mary Whitmore. (ecp) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS: This Court is in receipt of an e-mail from Defendant, dated 6/23/2023, which states that Defendant wishes to apply its already-filed Motion to Dismiss, ECF #5 , to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. This Court will accordingly consider Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF #5 , as a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to L.R. 7-1(e)(1), Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days to file and serve a response to Defendant's motion. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF #5 , is due 7/21/2023. Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the motion may result in dismissal of this action. Ordered on 7/7/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/7/23.) (jy)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: This Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, ECF #13 . This Court notes that Plaintiff has already filed a First Amended Complaint, ECF #10 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, a party may amend its pleading only once as a matter of course. Any subsequent amendment must be made either with the opposing party's written consent or with leave of the Court. Plaintiff has not provided written consent from Defendant to file a Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff also did not seek leave of this Court before filing the Second Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is STRICKEN. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint, or any subsequent amendment to the pleading, only with Defendant's written consent or by seeking leave of Court via a Motion to File an Amended Complaint. Ordered on 6/23/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/23/23.) (jy)
|
| Filing 13 {STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT}Second Amended Complaint. Filed by Mary Whitmore against All Defendants. (dino) Modified on 6/23/2023 (jy). |
| Filing 12 Updated Notice of Demand Amount. Filed by Mary Whitmore. (dino) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Service by Amazon.com Services, Inc. of Declaration #3 , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 , Declaration, #6 , Notice of Removal, #1 , Declaration #7 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Declaration #2 Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 10 Amended Complaint. Filed by Mary Whitmore against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dino) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Adrienne Nelson to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/13/2023.) (cw) |
|
Filing 8
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Adrienne Nelson and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 10/10/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 11/6/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 11/6/2023. Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/9/2023.) (dino)
|
| Filing 7 Declaration of Brent Hamilton ISO Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 6 Declaration of Donna Wiley ISO Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Oral Argument requested. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Zane Brown ISO Notice of Removal. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Brent Hamilton ISO Notice of Removal. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Related document(s): Notice of Removal, #1 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Hamilton, Wm.) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV17731 from Multnomah Circuit. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8972776 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Hamilton, Wm.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitmore v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Whitmore | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services, Inc. doing business as Amazon Fulfillment Center | |
| Represented By: | Wm. Brent Hamilton, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
