Stauffer et al v. Matarazzo et al
| David William Stauffer, I and Laura L. Stauffer |
| Judith H. Matarazzo, State of Oregon Courts, Anna K. Sortun, Tonkon Torp, LLP and Fitbit, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01136 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Adrienne Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 18
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 17
Second Memorandum in Opposition to Jurisdiction of Magistrate to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 , Motion to Dismiss #5 Oral Argument requested. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Stauffer, David )
|
|
Filing 16
Reply to Motion to Dismiss #5 . Filed by Judith H. Matarazzo, State of Oregon Courts. (Del Rubin, Sara)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application for CM/ECF Registration, ECF #12 , is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (joha)
|
|
Filing 14
Consent Declaration of Laura Louise Stauffer to Jurisdiction of Magistrate. Filed by Laura L. Stauffer. (Stauffer, David )
|
|
Filing 13
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 12
Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Laura L. Stauffer. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 11
Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 . Filed by Anna K. Sortun, Tonkon Torp, LLP. (Schroer, Janet)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party, ECF #8 , is GRANTED. Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (joha)
|
|
Filing 9
Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. #6 ) and Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #5 ). Filed by David William Stauffer. (dino)
|
|
Filing 8
Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by David William Stauffer. (ecp)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Attorney Withdrawal: Filed by Anna K. Sortun, Tonkon Torp, LLP. (Schroer, Janet)
|
|
Filing 6
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by Tonkon Torp, LLP, Anna K. Sortun. (Kalmanson, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion to Dismiss . Filed by State of Oregon Courts, Judith H. Matarazzo. (Del Rubin, Sara)
|
|
Filing 4
Return of Service Executed as to Judith H. Matarazzo served on 8/14/2023, answer due on 9/5/2023; Anna K. Sortun served on 8/8/2023, answer due on 8/29/2023. (eo)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Adrienne Nelson and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/4/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/2/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 1/2/2024. Ordered by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/4/2023.) (dino)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued by Intake as to Judith H. Matarazzo, Anna K. Sortun. (dino)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Receipt No. 103568. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by David William Stauffer, Laura L. Stauffer against Fitbit, Inc., Judith H. Matarazzo, Anna K. Sortun, State of Oregon Courts, Tonkon Torp, LLP (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dino)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
