Lane v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Scott Christopher Lane |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv01159 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance of Franco L. Becia appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance of Kevin C. Danielson appearing on behalf of All Defendants . Filed by on behalf of All Defendants. (Danielson, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #1 Social Security Complaint (Attachment 1 - Civil Cover Sheet). A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The PDF was not flattened. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties. (cw) |
Filing 4
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (sb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by attorney Edward A. Wicklund, ECF #2 . Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9041225. Filed by Scott Christopher Lane. (Wicklund, Edward) |
| Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9041170. Filed by Scott Christopher Lane against Commissioner Social Security Administration Social Security Answer is due by 12/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit "A", Appeals Council denial). (Bordelon, Jeremy) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/10/2023) (cw). |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Edward A. Wicklund. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9041225 #2 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (dino) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lane v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Christopher Lane | |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Wicklund |
| Represented By: | Jeremy L. Bordelon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Franco L. Becia |
| Represented By: | Kevin C. Danielson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
