Cimino v. ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C.
Plaintiff: Deborah Cimino
Defendant: ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C., dba Lazarus Naturals and ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C. doing business as Lazarus Naturals
Case Number: 3:2023cv01185
Filed: August 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jolie A Russo
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Defendant's Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time #6 as follows: Answer deadline reset to 11/13/2023 for Defendant ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C. (gm)
September 26, 2023 Filing 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by All Defendants. (Oborne, Scott)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #4 as follows: Answer deadline reset to 9/28/2023 for Defendant ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C. (gm)
September 7, 2023 Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C.. (Oborne, Scott)
August 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/13/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/12/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 1/12/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (ecp)
August 15, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (ecp)
August 14, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. Class Action Complaint Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9046491 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Deborah Cimino against ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C., dba Lazarus Naturals (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Barton, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cimino v. ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Cimino
Represented By: Paul B. Barton
Represented By: Alexander Graven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C., dba Lazarus Naturals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ETZ Hayim Holdings, S.P.C. doing business as Lazarus Naturals
Represented By: Anthony Copple
Represented By: Scott William Oborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?