Estrada v. Beigene USA, Inc.
| Elaine Estrada |
| Beigene, USA Inc. and Beigene USA, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01269 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Marco A Hernandez |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTES of Proceedings: Rule 16 Telephone Conference. The Court set the following case schedule: Add Parties/Amend Complaint by 1/2/2024. Discovery is to be completed by 6/28/2024. Dispositive Motions are due by 7/26/2024. Oral Argument is set for 10/7/2024 at 01:30PM in Portland Courtroom 15A before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report and Pretrial Order are due by 7/26/2024, if no dispositive motions are filed, or 30 days after resolution of dispositive motions. A Pretrial Conference is set for 1/27/2025 at 01:30PM in Portland Courtroom 15A before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. A 4-day Jury Trial is set for 2/4/2025 at 09:00AM in Portland Courtroom 15A before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Richard Meyers present as counsel for plaintiff(s). Cristin Casey present as counsel for defendant(s). Court Reporter: Ryan White. Judge Marco A. Hernandez presiding. (jp) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Joint Case Management Schedule . Filed by All Defendants. (Berg, John) |
Filing 6
Scheduling Order. A Rule 16 Telephone Conference is set for 10/18/2023 at 01:30PM before Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Counsel are required to confer prior to the conference. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. The Court directs the parties to file a jointly proposed schedule no later than Noon two business days before the hearing (keeping in mind that Judge Hernandez expects civil cases to be tried within 18 months of the date of filing). The parties shall call into the Court's conference line (the phone number will be provided via separate notice) five minutes prior to the scheduled conference time. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|
| Filing 5 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) . Filed by Beigene USA, Inc.. (Berg, John) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #1 Notice of Removal (Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet). A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The PDF was not flattened. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties. (cw) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Marco A. Hernandez and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 12/29/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/29/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 1/29/2024. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sb)
|
| Filing 2 Declaration of Cristin Casey . Filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Casey, Cristin) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV30525 from Multnomah Circuit County. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9066249 issued.. Filed by Beigene, USA Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Casey, Cristin) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/31/2023) (cw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
