Wortham v. Washington County et al
Plaintiff: Red Wortham
Defendant: Washington County and Sherriff Patrick Garrett
Case Number: 3:2023cv01307
Filed: September 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Granting Defendant Washington County's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #6 ), and Granting Defendant Patrick Garrett's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #7 ). Answers or other responsive pleadings are due by 11/27/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
October 25, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint #1 . Filed by Patrick Garrett. (Vickers, Karen)
October 23, 2023 Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint #1 . Filed by Washington County. (Kotori, Blerina)
September 13, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Patrick Garrett, Washington County. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (dino)
September 12, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons for Defendant Patrick Garrett Filed by Red Wortham. (Snyder, Daniel)
September 12, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Defendant Washington County, Oregon Filed by Red Wortham. (Snyder, Daniel)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 1/8/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/5/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 2/5/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (dino)
September 7, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9075462 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Red Wortham against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Snyder, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wortham v. Washington County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Red Wortham
Represented By: Carl Lee Post
Represented By: John D. Burgess
Represented By: Daniel J. Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington County
Represented By: Blerina Kotori
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherriff Patrick Garrett
Represented By: Beth Plass
Represented By: Karen M. Vickers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?