Groshong v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. et al
Joel C Groshong |
MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and John Does 1-5 |
3:2023cv01348 |
September 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jeff Armistead |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Reply to Motion to Remand to State Court #7 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Joel C Groshong. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Terry Scannell Declaration) (Scannell, Terry) |
Filing 14 Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand to State Court #7 . Filed by MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC. (Farrell, Michael) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Granting Stipulated Motion to Extend Response Deadlines #12 . Deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendants' counterclaim is extended until ten (10) days after the Court rules on plaintiff's motion to remand. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (pjg) |
Filing 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Answer to Complaint-Notice of Removal, Counterclaim #5 . Filed by Joel C Groshong. (Scannell, Terry) |
Filing 11 ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time #10 . Plaintiff's answer to defendants' counterclaim is due by 10/20/2023. Response to Motion to Remand #7 due by 10/20/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (pjg) |
Filing 10 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time of Response Deadlines. Filed by MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC. (Cramer, David) |
Filing 9 Scheduling Order: Motion to Remand to State Court #7 is taken under advisement as of 12/27/2023. Request for oral argument will be considered in due course. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (pjg) |
Filing 8 Declaration of Terry Scannell . Filed by Joel C Groshong. (Related document(s): Motion to Remand, #7 .) (Scannell, Terry) |
Filing 7 Motion to Remand to State Court. Oral Argument requested.Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Joel C Groshong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Remand - Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Motion to Remand - Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Motion to Remand - Exhibit 3) (Scannell, Terry) |
Filing 6 ORDER issued by Judge Armistead: Setting a Telephone Rule 16 Conference for Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 11:30 AM in Portland before Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. The court's conference call information will be provided to the parties by separate sealed entry. Local Rules 16-2(b) and 26-1 require that counsel confer prior to the conference. Rule 16 Conferences are ordinarily held telephonically. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to discuss the status of the case, relevant dates and deadlines, and any other significant issues. If the parties plan to present a proposed schedule, they should e-mail the schedule to pam_geringer@ord.uscourts.gov, by noon on December 6, 2023. Alternatively, the parties may file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan by noon on December 6, 2023. If the proposed schedule is acceptable to the court and no significant issues need to be discussed, the court may decide that the Rule 16 Conference is unnecessary and strike it. The parties may file written consents to magistrate judge jurisdiction at any time, but the court recommends that consent forms be filed before a dispositive motion (i.e., motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment) is heard. (The consent form is attached.) For more information regarding the role of magistrate judges and consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction, see ord.uscourts.gov/consent. If the parties have a discovery dispute, they should jointly e-mail Courtroom Deputy Pam Geringer at the e-mail address above, and the court will promptly schedule a telephonic hearing to discuss the matter. (pjg) Modified on 9/25/2023 (pjg). |
Filing 5 Answer to Complaint following a Notice of Removal (Related Doc. #1 ) , Counterclaim Against Plaintiff Joel C Groshong. Filed by Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, MTGLQ Investors, L.P.. (Farrell, Michael) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 1/16/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/15/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 2/15/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (sb) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC. (Farrell, Michael) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by MTGLQ Investors, L.P.. (Farrell, Michael) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV34905 from Washington County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9084998 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, MTGLQ Investors, L.P. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint and exhibits, #2 Exhibit 2-Plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause-TRO, #3 Exhibit 3-Decl of J Groshong in Support of Motion to Show Cause-TRO, #4 Exhibit 4-Decl of T Scannell in Support of Motion to Show Cause-TRO, #5 Exhibit 5-Order Granting TRO and to Show Cause, #6 Exhibit 6-Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause, #7 Exhibit 7-Decl of Anthony Younger in Support of Defendants' Response, #8 Exhibit 8-Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Show Cause, #9 Exhibit 9-Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Decl of A. Younger, #10 Exhibit 10-Order Extending TRO, #11 Civil Cover Sheet). (Farrell, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.