Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Liu et al
| Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
| Alan Liu and Lynn D Prest |
| 3:2023cv01455 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #9 Motion for default,. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: An incorrect PDF was attached to the entry. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties. (dsg) |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Al Roundtree . Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Related document(s): Motion for default #9 .) (Roundtree, Al) |
| Filing 9 Motion for Entry of Default . Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Roundtree, Al) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/8/2023) (dsg). (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/8/2023) (dsg). Motion for Entry of Default . Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Roundtree, Al) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/8/2023) (dsg). (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/8/2023) (dsg). |
Filing 8
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Curtis A. Johnson. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9144482. Filed by Lynn D Prest. (Johnson, Curtis) |
| Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Curtis A. Johnson. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9144482 #7 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (dino) |
| Filing 6 Answer to Complaint, #1 Defendant Lynn D. Prest's Answer to Interpleader-Plaintiff's Complaint.(Related document(s): Complaint, #1 .) Filed by Lynn D Prest. (Snider, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service upon Lynn D Prest served on 10/21/2023, answer due on 11/13/2023 Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Roundtree, Al) |
| Filing 4 Affidavit of Service upon Alan Liu served on 10/18/2023, answer due on 11/8/2023 Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Roundtree, Al) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Alan Liu, Lynn D Prest. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (dino) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/5/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/4/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 3/4/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dino)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9107301 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A. against Alan Liu, Lynn D Prest (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons). (Roundtree, Al) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
