Burton et al v. Legacy Health
| Rebecca Burton, Michael Harpel, Jina Lehman, Galina Lopuga, Lori Sahlin and Ludmyla Panov |
| Legacy Health |
| 3:2023cv01528 |
| October 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Legacy Health waiver sent on 10/25/2023. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Janzen, Caroline) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/15/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/18/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 3/18/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (ecp)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9119782 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Ludmyla Panov, Rebecca Burton, Galina Lopuga, Jina Lehman, Michael Harpel, Lori Sahlin against Legacy Health (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Janzen, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
