Bobo v. State of Oregon et al
Ivy Marie Bobo |
State of Oregon, Jeff Auxier, Multnomah County Sheriff and East Precinct Police Station |
3:2023cv01905 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Marco A Hernandez |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF 2, and dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies noted above no later than March 1, 2024. The Court advises Plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint by March 1, 2024, will result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/29/2024 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/29/2024.) (pvh) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/19/2023.) (dino) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Ivy Marie Bobo. (dino) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Ivy Marie Bobo against Jeff Auxier, East Precinct Police Station, Multnomah County Sheriff, State of Oregon (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dino) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.