M&C Construction LLC v. Wu & Associates, Inc.
| M&C Construction LLC |
| Wu & Associates, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00034 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: This Court GRANTS the Parties' Stipulated Order of Dismissal, ECF #6 , pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Karin J. Immergut on 2/29/2024. (jy)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal by M&C Construction LLC. Filed by M&C Construction LLC. (Sherwood, Ashley) |
| Filing 5 60-DAY ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to LR 41-1, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs and with leave, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to have this order of dismissal set aside and the action reinstated if the settlement is not consummated. Pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. By Clerk of Court Melissa Aubin. (jy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO NON-ADMITTED COUNSEL: Our records indicate that counsel, Ashley J. Sherwood, is not admitted to practice in the District of Oregon. Admissions information is governed by #LR 83, and information about the admissions process is available on the #admissions page of the Court website. (dino) |
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Karin J. Immergut and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 5/7/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/6/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 6/6/2024. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (dino)
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Defendants. (Meyer, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV48580 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. Filing Fee in amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9222937 issued. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.. Filed by Wu & Associates, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Meyer, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: M&C Construction LLC v. Wu & Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: M&C Construction LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ashley J. Sherwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wu & Associates, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Andrea R. Meyer |
| Represented By: | Jason W. Alexander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
