Bogosian v. Washington County
| James Leroy Bogosian |
| Washington County |
| 3:2024cv00148 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: Based on the Record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Signed on 2/29/2024 by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/1/2024.) (pvh)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO DISMISS: Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/29/2024 by Judge Adrienne Nelson. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/1/2024.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order #4 sent to James Leroy Bogosian returned as undeliverable. (sb) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Reassignment Notice #3 sent to James Leroy Bogosian returned as undeliverable. (sb) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Assignment Notice #2 sent to James Leroy Bogosian returned as undeliverable. (sb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner must submit the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Petitioner's failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed on 1/23/2024 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited order and IFP application in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/23/2024.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/23/24.) (eo) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/23/24.) (eo) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid). Filed by James Leroy Bogosian against Washington County. (eo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bogosian v. Washington County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Leroy Bogosian | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Washington County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
