White v. Retina Northwest, PC
Plaintiff: Deanna White
Defendant: Retina Northwest, PC
Case Number: 3:2024cv00225
Filed: February 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Filing 7 Declaration of Orchid A. Tosh in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or in the Alternative, to Make More Definite and Certain. Filed by Retina Northwest, PC. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #6 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24) (Tosh, Orchid)
March 22, 2024 Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, to Make More Definite and Certain. Oral Argument requested. Filed by Retina Northwest, PC. (Tosh, Orchid)
February 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Defendants Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #4 is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants response is due by 3/22/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
February 23, 2024 Filing 4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint [EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED]. Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by Retina Northwest, PC. (Tosh, Orchid)
February 2, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Retina Northwest, PC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (gd)
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/3/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 7/1/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 7/1/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gd)
February 2, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9262941 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Deanna White against Retina Northwest, PC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Liss, Serena)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Retina Northwest, PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna White
Represented By: Aaron W. Baker
Represented By: Serena Liss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retina Northwest, PC
Represented By: Suzanne K. Michael
Represented By: Orchid Tosh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?