Slevin v. Tae Hong Choi Trust et al
| Conner Slevin |
| Tae Hong Choi Trust and Hung K. Choi |
| 3:2024cv00440 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Tae Hong Choi Trust. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (gd) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 7/8/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 8/5/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (gd)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9315301 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Conner Slevin against Hung K. Choi, THE TAE HONG CHOI TRUST (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Molligan, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
